Posts: 351
Threads: 194
Joined: Apr 2013
http://nextbigfuture.com/2014/02/other-i...ional.html
30 SDs above average is the estimate of a person with all deletrious genes removed.
SHARKS (crossed out) MONGEESE (sic) WITH FRICKIN' LASER BEAMS ATTACHED TO THEIR HEADS
Posts: 7,368
Threads: 297
Joined: Jan 2013
04-25-2014, 03:17 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-25-2014, 03:43 AM by Rynn.)
This is a flawed assumption based on
an interpretation of the data. I haven't gone over the relevant papers but the claim of 550 IQ comes from the author taking a quote that an average person has 1000 alleles negatively associated with IQ and there is some data that showed that individuals with an IQ 1SD higher had 30 less of these alleles on average. To get to 550 the author carried that pattern on, they've basically done
this.
Assuming for a moment that this data can be trusted and its interpretation is correct in that these alleles are negatively correlated with IQ and that IQ is an accurate measure of intelligence then it is still stupid to make that extrapolation. The effect might not be linear, or those alleles might have roles in other systems that cause bigger problems when you try to remove some of them.
The link between genotype and phenotype needs a lot more work, as does our understanding of intelligence and the role of nature vs nurture, long before we can start making predictions of this manner.
Posts: 11,788
Threads: 454
Joined: Apr 2013
Of course IQ is an average measure, so any increase of intelligence will merely make the tests more difficult, rather than increasing the total score. The average IQ will always be 100.