05-08-2014, 09:42 PM
(05-08-2014, 07:57 AM)Ithuriel Wrote: Nah. You'll reduce some of the wear, but you've still got what basically amounts to a plasma explosion inside the barrel of your gun, and there aren't many materials that will stand up to that.
Sounds like a challenge.
I bet an answer could be found in coatings before you need to get to cold plasma armatures. There are some low friction, arc-resistance coatings in the electrical industry today like cadmium oxide.
Quote:(04-14-2014, 11:49 AM)Cray Wrote: In the worst case, you might try sacrificial rails. After every few rail shots, eject the rails and slide in some new ones.
I believe that is exactly what the naval railguns will do. It'll still be cheaper than a bunch of cruise missiles or antiship missiles.
The Navy probably doesn't mind because their battleship guns only had a barrel life of a few hundred rounds. Barrel wear is a known issue for them.
Mike Miller, Materials Engineer
----------------------
"Everbody's always in favor of saving Hitler's brain, but when you put it in the body of a great white shark, oh, suddenly you've gone too far." -- Professor Farnsworth, Futurama
----------------------
"Everbody's always in favor of saving Hitler's brain, but when you put it in the body of a great white shark, oh, suddenly you've gone too far." -- Professor Farnsworth, Futurama