10-07-2016, 05:45 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-07-2016, 05:50 PM by stevebowers.)
I tend to think that if an article has a date in it, that date can go into the timeline, together with a link. Not all dated events need to go into the timeline, however. This was Alan's philosophy back when he first created the timeline, which probably explains all the Ken Ferjik references (when the Ken Ferjik article was written, the timeline was almost completely bare).
We need to be a bit circumspect about how we word the entry in the timeline. so that we don't make the event out to be more important than it is (the Waverider, for instance, was one of several surface-to-orbit technologies at this time, but not necessarily the most important one).
We need to be a bit circumspect about how we word the entry in the timeline. so that we don't make the event out to be more important than it is (the Waverider, for instance, was one of several surface-to-orbit technologies at this time, but not necessarily the most important one).