07-29-2013, 03:47 AM
Just a possibility- for the eventual site redesign..
On some of the pages, it might be helpful to have a (separate) tab showing how the numbers/ conclusions/ calculations have been arrived at, particularly on topics that are often challenged. The wormhole article, for example, has a variety of references.
Wormholes
http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/48545a0f6352a
Population
http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/4b3f706772ad0
Transapient Brain Size
http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/4a53a8f690f09
Currently, there are a few pages where there's references or calculations. If it would be more convenient and organized to place these in a separate tab, similar to wikipedia's article/ talk system, it might be helpful. Perhaps the "development Notes" section at the bottom is sufficient, as in the Population article. If it would be also helpful to have a link to the discussion date/ number from the forums for reference, that's a possibility too.
Does this sound like it's worth the trouble?
On some of the pages, it might be helpful to have a (separate) tab showing how the numbers/ conclusions/ calculations have been arrived at, particularly on topics that are often challenged. The wormhole article, for example, has a variety of references.
Wormholes
http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/48545a0f6352a
Population
http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/4b3f706772ad0
Transapient Brain Size
http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/4a53a8f690f09
Currently, there are a few pages where there's references or calculations. If it would be more convenient and organized to place these in a separate tab, similar to wikipedia's article/ talk system, it might be helpful. Perhaps the "development Notes" section at the bottom is sufficient, as in the Population article. If it would be also helpful to have a link to the discussion date/ number from the forums for reference, that's a possibility too.
Does this sound like it's worth the trouble?
![[Image: Gaylien1.png]](https://www.orionsarm.com/im_store/Gaylien1.png)